Skip to main content

Brain Rules | Book Review

Brain Rules - John Medina


A decently refreshing book about the workings of a brain. It will definitely attract and fascinate the not so very well informed people about the topic of brain. Its a fun book for binge reading about the limits and extreme capacities of a normal human brain.



The book gives ample information about various aspects of brain very interestingly, giving real life examples and with engaging personal anecdotes. Often times we overestimate our power to control and manipulate our own brain capacities according to our needs. We take it for granted. And ofteb ignoring the basic brain rules by which our mind functions most effectively. Such as sleeping well, exercising, drinking enough water, meditation, proper diet and chemical wiring. And oftentimes we underestimate the capacities of our most important gift, by under utilising it.

Brain rules isn't a dense thick academic book about the subject. It is a lighter and less mainstream one and can be referred to for understanding the basic concepts. As it can be guessed from the title, it gives 12 rules or principles for thriving and surviving at work, school and home. It offers 12 basic conceptions and misconceptions about the brain which are important to clarify. It focuses on the most basic things such as: can it perform optimally without proper sleep. The answer is straight No! And needs to be clarified. Or does male and female brains work differently. Or how we can increase our retention levels and improve cognition. These questions should have proper and easy answers to be able reach to the general public without being inaccurate an inaccessible. The author does that here, giving simple answers to simple and apparently most important questions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The White Tiger | Movie Review

The White Tiger - 2021 Directed By : Ramin Bahrani The White Tiger have many kind of problems, but they are not very stark. They are not significant, but still quite obstruct this film to be a lot better than what it is. This is awkward, lukewarm and confusing film throughout, but enjoying nonetheless. As an adaptation of Arvind Adiga's Booker Prize winning book, this film is somewhat accurate and faithful to its source material. The book was also quite lukewarm and confusing. And if I am allowed to be little more critical, it was gimmicky. And the film somewhat makes that gimmick much more obvious and visible here. There are instances where you have to join the universal opinion and question your own judgment because of it. When you read a book or watch a film, people are so crazed about that piece of work, but you don't see the greatness of the work which the people around you are referring to. And more often than not, you question your own judgement in that case ...

Pyaasa | Movie Review

Pyaasa - 1957 Directed By : Guru Dutt One of the true pleasures of watching Pyaasa is Guru Dutt's face and his genuine expressions. It doesn't seem like he is playing a character; he is playing himself. Such is the power of those expressions. The genuineness of eyes, the horror in the same eyes when he is exposed to the dirty existence of social hypocrisies and selfishness. Or genuine delight over simplest of things. Or the childlike wonder about the world around him. Everything about that face felt so real and human.  Here is an actor who knows art of acting. While others are waving their hands obsessively, exaggerating expressions, speaking dramatically and mechanically, leaving no traces of subtlety; Dutt is subtle, hardly exaggerating or waving his hands or making faces. He is still. His every word leaves an impact, whether he is angry, sad, disappointed, horrified or happy. Every emotion is portrayed to its utmost perfection. Here is someone who is magical, mys...

Locke | Movie Review

Locke - 2013 Directed By : Steven Knight I like to think that Locke is perhaps about stoicism. Its a lesson about stoicism. Perhaps about how to handle situations which are out of control. And in the end stoicism prevails. Perhaps its not hardcore or perfect form of stoicism which is described in the books. Ivan Locke has his faults. He shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. It isn't his dead father's fault that he has impregnated a women who is not his wife. Or he should have been more sensitive to the woman who carries his child. He is sensible man though, his soul is being tortured, his mind is not at rest and his whole world is falling apart in front of him. Yet he bears it all. He is determined to his thing, right thing. And probably thats the basic idea of stoicism, isn't it? Sometimes it is confusing to define stoicism. It has its shades, its variants. Ivan Locke has his variants. He has a deep urge to save the ruins of his already d...