Skip to main content

Crucial Conversations | Book Review

Crucial Conversations 


This is an extremely helpful and resourceful book, if one is very inclined to improve his ability to communicate. It is so disastrous having not been able to say what you actually want to say and end up misunderstood yourself. There is always a huge gap between what is actually you think and what you end up saying. Everyone does not have a gift of conveying his ideas through exact words. And the stakes are, seriously, high while talking, not just professionally but also personally within your own circle of influence.


It was an insightful book, to understand the art of communication. But applying them is not easy as it sounds. It needs self control, refraining from acting on destructive impulses of making your point without understanding the nature of the conversation. We are not really wired to talk about things that matters, but in moments of introspection, we realise how massive was the impact of those things we talked so casually about. And how these infinitesimal moments of conversations, make huge differences in the long run. And I cant stress the importance of the issue more, because ultimately communicating is as important as any other skills, specially in these confusing times.


Anyways, talking about the book, it is quite non clichéd book. Well it does not necessarily tell you how you can change the whole world with your charm and power of communication. Like many other self help books. Its quite practical book, insightful, giving many alternative ways you can deal with particular situations.


I see no solid reasons to arraign the book. It was an interesting book. You will find subtle similarities with Convey's book, the overall humanistic impression of book in general. And it was actually recommended by Covey himself. So if you are admirer of him then the the chances are that you are going to like this one too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Locke | Movie Review

Locke - 2013 Directed By : Steven Knight I like to think that Locke is perhaps about stoicism. Its a lesson about stoicism. Perhaps about how to handle situations which are out of control. And in the end stoicism prevails. Perhaps its not hardcore or perfect form of stoicism which is described in the books. Ivan Locke has his faults. He shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. It isn't his dead father's fault that he has impregnated a women who is not his wife. Or he should have been more sensitive to the woman who carries his child. He is sensible man though, his soul is being tortured, his mind is not at rest and his whole world is falling apart in front of him. Yet he bears it all. He is determined to his thing, right thing. And probably thats the basic idea of stoicism, isn't it? Sometimes it is confusing to define stoicism. It has its shades, its variants. Ivan Locke has his variants. He has a deep urge to save the ruins of his already d...

The Magic Of Thinking Big | Book Review

     After certain level these kind of books dont help at all. Although I have to agree with whatever the author has to say but it doesnt make a huge impact on me in the long term. I even forgot that I had read it a few months ago. This is not about this book in general but all others in the self-help genre. It might make difference to the people who actually act after reading such stuff, and who have certain degree of control on their impulses and actions.       This review seems to be more about my reading priority than the work of the author. The author have of course fair ideas about how you can make change and be productive and successful and the best and the most important and........ But at the end it depends on the reader himself to how extent he is ready to act and change himself accordingly.      There are huge number of books being published in these genre everyday. All of them presenting same ideas but putting dif...

The White Tiger | Movie Review

The White Tiger - 2021 Directed By : Ramin Bahrani The White Tiger have many kind of problems, but they are not very stark. They are not significant, but still quite obstruct this film to be a lot better than what it is. This is awkward, lukewarm and confusing film throughout, but enjoying nonetheless. As an adaptation of Arvind Adiga's Booker Prize winning book, this film is somewhat accurate and faithful to its source material. The book was also quite lukewarm and confusing. And if I am allowed to be little more critical, it was gimmicky. And the film somewhat makes that gimmick much more obvious and visible here. There are instances where you have to join the universal opinion and question your own judgment because of it. When you read a book or watch a film, people are so crazed about that piece of work, but you don't see the greatness of the work which the people around you are referring to. And more often than not, you question your own judgement in that case ...