Skip to main content

Life | Movie Review

Life - 2017
Directed by : Daniel Espinosa 

The idea of this film might or might not be original but it offered a good thrill nonetheless. No film have absolutely original idea of its own. Every film has some influences on it of other movies. It might seem that this movie is just a poorly implemented replica of Alien. But Alien itself had drawn some its influences from others. So it is not completely unethical for a film to get its influences from other movies, given that it have its own world and own bunch of original ideas. And Life has some of its own unique achievements.


Although it is definitely not one of the greatest sci-fi horror flick but it provides a decently engaging thrill throughout. It would be inappropriate to compare it to something like Alien, 2001, Gravity or some of the bests out there. We would only be disappointing ourselves because of it. When you watch it as an independent movie itself, it provides a fairly decent watch. And it claims no better. 

Anyhow it is one those movies which you dont regret watching, still at the same time think that maybe you should have watched something better. It is low brain commercial movie, and it does its job well. 

There is not much of a plot or confusing storyline to talk about, just bunch of astronauts freaking over a newly found outer species which threatens to kill them. Thats all there is with respect to plot. 

One of my favorite part of the film was the fact that it created that sense of terror and dread. That alien really looked and felt frightening. It had its own character and had that dreading presence. It really happened because of some impressive special effects used to create that creature. The movie was visually pleasing to look at, as nearly all space movies are. 

Maybe the best thing with this movie was Jake Gyllenhaal. No matter which movie he is in, he always brings something great. While the other cast did whatever was required from them, but Gyllenhaal was surely the odd one out. The other cast including Ryan Reynolds, Rebecca Ferguson, Sanada and Bakare did a decent job too. But problem was characterisation. The characters looked unrealistic, no matter how much talented they are, if they dont have anything to work on they are surely going to look odd. And they did actually look odd. With only exception of Gyllenhaal and thats why he deserves more appreciation. 

Although it is fairly enjoyable movie, there were many of its faults too. One was psychological incoherence of characters. They surely did not look like NASA astronauts but some freaked out teenagers who have no idea what to do next, of course that was one of the fun reasons to enjoy this film as well, but its hardly possible to overlook that fault.

Overall it was an engaging watch, with its own little flaws with its own little graces. It was just fine. And dont know about others but i loved the ending. It was amusing.

Rating : ★★★

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maqbool | Movie Review

Maqbool - 2003 Directed by : Vishal Bhardwaj Maqbool is a clever character study of a man's gradual descent from loyalty to betrayal; from respect to rage; from reason to madness; from life to eventual and tragic death. Vishal Bhardwaj's Maqbool is powerful adaptation of Shakespeare's tragedy, Macbeth, which deals with themes of loyalty, betrayal, love, guilt and death. Set in underworld of Mumbai, Maqbool is realistic portrait of world of gangsters' and their psyche. It is oftentimes dark, serious, repressed and at unexpected times wickedly funny.  Jahagir Khan aka Abba ji(Pankaj Kapoor with his Brando-esque mannerisms), is an aging don of Mumbai, who runs the crime world, with the help of his loyal lieutenant, Maqbool(Irrfan Khan) and Kaka, his loyal(underrated Piyush Mishra). Purohit and Pundit, are two utterly corrupt cops who help them fight their rivals(played charmingly by Naseeruddin Shah and Om Puri respectively). They are film's charm and wit. ...

Locke | Movie Review

Locke - 2013 Directed By : Steven Knight I like to think that Locke is perhaps about stoicism. Its a lesson about stoicism. Perhaps about how to handle situations which are out of control. And in the end stoicism prevails. Perhaps its not hardcore or perfect form of stoicism which is described in the books. Ivan Locke has his faults. He shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. It isn't his dead father's fault that he has impregnated a women who is not his wife. Or he should have been more sensitive to the woman who carries his child. He is sensible man though, his soul is being tortured, his mind is not at rest and his whole world is falling apart in front of him. Yet he bears it all. He is determined to his thing, right thing. And probably thats the basic idea of stoicism, isn't it? Sometimes it is confusing to define stoicism. It has its shades, its variants. Ivan Locke has his variants. He has a deep urge to save the ruins of his already d...

The Magic Of Thinking Big | Book Review

     After certain level these kind of books dont help at all. Although I have to agree with whatever the author has to say but it doesnt make a huge impact on me in the long term. I even forgot that I had read it a few months ago. This is not about this book in general but all others in the self-help genre. It might make difference to the people who actually act after reading such stuff, and who have certain degree of control on their impulses and actions.       This review seems to be more about my reading priority than the work of the author. The author have of course fair ideas about how you can make change and be productive and successful and the best and the most important and........ But at the end it depends on the reader himself to how extent he is ready to act and change himself accordingly.      There are huge number of books being published in these genre everyday. All of them presenting same ideas but putting dif...