Skip to main content

Rosemary's Baby | Movie Review

Rosemary's Baby: 1968
Directed By: Roman Polanski


Rosemary's baby is an eery, haunting, bleak and darkly comic horror-noir movie which is apparently a perfect psychological horror in every sense. Directed by Roman Polanski in 1968, the film offers an awfully fatal ambience to it, which we sense from the very first moments of the film. 

The story is about a couple who is just moved into a new apartment in order to get their life started and settle there. It seems obvious that they are newly married couple, cheery and conscious of each others preferences and struggles. They were warned by one of their friend that the place have a sinister past and moving there might not be the best idea, but they disregard the idea saying that these things are just made up by people, so they moved in anyways. This couple is Rosemary and her husband, a struggling wannabe actor, played adroitly by Mia Farrow and John Cassavetes respectively. But just when they move into that apartment things start to go wrong and frightful, Rosemary's gets frantic and fragile everyday. 



The couple get to meet their neighbors who live the next door, the old lonely couple who live by their own, with no children and apparent attachments to relatives. They are nosey, obnoxious and curious people, especially the old women, who is kind of lady who asks people the prices of their sofa, cushions, curtains and dishes which makes them unwelcomed by anyone. The acting is top notch by both of them particularly by Ruth Gordon, who won the Oscars for her role.

Soon, Rosemary is going to have a baby. And she is happy and does everything for the wellbeing of it and the family. The plot does not even matter now, we are interested in what the characters are going through and how they would turn out to be. There are sinister and nefarious things are going on, someone's trying to kill the baby, Rosemary suspects this and makes her insecurities visible to her husband. She sees conspiracies everywhere, everyone is involved, ''all of them witches!!", she says in one of the crucial moments of the film of utter confusion and hopelessness. 

The tension and turmoil of Rosemary expands and expands. Mia Farrow did great job portraying the doubts and confusion of Rosemary. There are few moments of ambiguity in order to make us question whether all the happenings are just fragments of her own imagination and not that of the demonic powers. That ambiguity works for the movie and create more suspense and dread. 

When we are exposed in the end to what really have happened, we have a big suprise, but at the same time we not at all suprised. We have to confront to the reality as Rosemary does at the end. We knew it was inevitable and she knew it as well. And we are left with nothing but to accept in disbelief and abhor the ones she believed the most. 
 

Rating - ★★★★½
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pyaasa | Movie Review

Pyaasa - 1957 Directed By : Guru Dutt One of the true pleasures of watching Pyaasa is Guru Dutt's face and his genuine expressions. It doesn't seem like he is playing a character; he is playing himself. Such is the power of those expressions. The genuineness of eyes, the horror in the same eyes when he is exposed to the dirty existence of social hypocrisies and selfishness. Or genuine delight over simplest of things. Or the childlike wonder about the world around him. Everything about that face felt so real and human.  Here is an actor who knows art of acting. While others are waving their hands obsessively, exaggerating expressions, speaking dramatically and mechanically, leaving no traces of subtlety; Dutt is subtle, hardly exaggerating or waving his hands or making faces. He is still. His every word leaves an impact, whether he is angry, sad, disappointed, horrified or happy. Every emotion is portrayed to its utmost perfection. Here is someone who is magical, mys...
Post a Comment
Read more

Locke | Movie Review

Locke - 2013 Directed By : Steven Knight I like to think that Locke is perhaps about stoicism. Its a lesson about stoicism. Perhaps about how to handle situations which are out of control. And in the end stoicism prevails. Perhaps its not hardcore or perfect form of stoicism which is described in the books. Ivan Locke has his faults. He shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. It isn't his dead father's fault that he has impregnated a women who is not his wife. Or he should have been more sensitive to the woman who carries his child. He is sensible man though, his soul is being tortured, his mind is not at rest and his whole world is falling apart in front of him. Yet he bears it all. He is determined to his thing, right thing. And probably thats the basic idea of stoicism, isn't it? Sometimes it is confusing to define stoicism. It has its shades, its variants. Ivan Locke has his variants. He has a deep urge to save the ruins of his already d...
Post a Comment
Read more

#Day 66, An Old Man And His Precious Tapri Filled With Classic Books

As I was crossing a street in some part of Jalgaon, I came across a little book shop. It was a like a typical Indian tapri. To be clear it indeed was a  tapri . The old man, the owner of that shop, evidently had to sustain by selling cigarettes, paanmasalas ,  gutkas and similar stuff. Presumably he couldn't sustain himself by selling only the books. And the books too, which no one reads anymore. I stopped to have a look. English Classics interested me more than anything else. Sadly they were the most torn out pieces amongst the whole) entire bunch. My eyes smiled after detecting George Eliot, Henry James, Thackeray and alike. What suprised me the most however was the fact that how passionate the old man was while showing and talking about his books. Particularly when I said he had very good bunch of classic books. He grew more and more passionate as I was looking for everything in his little tapri . And he knew each and every book and could discern what each particular book ...
Post a Comment
Read more