Skip to main content

Tess | Movie Review

Tess - 1979
Directed By : Roman Polanski

Tess is a very frustrating character. You start to question her many times in the film. Whether she is pure, angelic, enduring or just plain stupid. She surely not an idiot though, and there is a real frustration. The pain and misery she goes through seems at times to be self induced. But it is way more complicated than that to understand the origin of her misery. And though her own naivety or her ignorance about the evils of society, and, people in general cause her much of that misery, they aren't certainly the only reasons or even the chief reasons. 

Hardy's masterful prose definitely raises questions on the plight of people like Tess. One must acknowledge that Tess do exist in real world. And that makes the character so frustrating. Countless number of Tess are bearing the pains others have inflicted without raising a word, silently. And Hardy so sensitively put forward one such story of misery and tragedy. The characters and their behaviours, beliefs, habits, flaws and virtues provide most of the substance to the book, and the film as well. It is a thoroughly important film to discuss, muse and contemplate over. 

The film carefully handled the dense source material. The most admiring aspect of the film being its richness of setting and exquisitely shot visuals. Rarely it happens that a film captures the amount of realism in a setting and accuracy in period which Tess did. The world built here is exquisite in every sense of its word. Shot originally in France, it really captures the essence of Hardy's natural and utterly breathtaking description of the setting and environment. Though Hardy's world was perhaps much more darker and gloomy. Hardy tried to convey things though the environment and it is important to get it right. Tess do it to a satisfying extent. 

There is a seriousness the way film handles the subject which is so intricate and complex to put onto the screen. It is ambiguous and layered. Still, perhaps the films in general are not as efficient medium as books to convey the complex emotions, intricacies of human nature and relations, and deep desires, needs and beliefs of a person. For instance, the film does not convincingly portray the inner world of Tess, her desires or her emotions. Why she bears it all? Why she isn't rebellious? Why she do not oppose? Or what she actually wants? Its ambiguous. It remains a mystery throughout. Or take example of Angel, we never quite understand him as well. 

Certainly, the characters are layered. And there is enough to unweave below the visible surface. It isn't a shallow adaptation, or exercise in particular way of filmmaking, instead a deeply felt and thoughtful interpretation. It takes its time, it don't rush or try to make it an easy watch, more the better. 

One of the things lacking is the incompleteness of the Tess' gradual journey through misery and pain. We cant quite sympathise with her as we ought to. Another way of saying it can be that, she should suffer more. It certainly is not that. The revelations Tess goes through that non ending misery is actually crucial to be shown much more effectively. Her non ending misery is painful yet it serves an important purpose. And though there is not a neglect towards it, it isn't quite as effective. Though this is just a personal whim of mine. 

The film is gradually growing on me. In retrospect I find it much more thoughtful and important film than what I first conceived it to be. It is a film which will linger in my mind for quite a some time now. 

Rating : ★★★½ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Locke | Movie Review

Locke - 2013 Directed By : Steven Knight I like to think that Locke is perhaps about stoicism. Its a lesson about stoicism. Perhaps about how to handle situations which are out of control. And in the end stoicism prevails. Perhaps its not hardcore or perfect form of stoicism which is described in the books. Ivan Locke has his faults. He shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. It isn't his dead father's fault that he has impregnated a women who is not his wife. Or he should have been more sensitive to the woman who carries his child. He is sensible man though, his soul is being tortured, his mind is not at rest and his whole world is falling apart in front of him. Yet he bears it all. He is determined to his thing, right thing. And probably thats the basic idea of stoicism, isn't it? Sometimes it is confusing to define stoicism. It has its shades, its variants. Ivan Locke has his variants. He has a deep urge to save the ruins of his already d...

The Magic Of Thinking Big | Book Review

     After certain level these kind of books dont help at all. Although I have to agree with whatever the author has to say but it doesnt make a huge impact on me in the long term. I even forgot that I had read it a few months ago. This is not about this book in general but all others in the self-help genre. It might make difference to the people who actually act after reading such stuff, and who have certain degree of control on their impulses and actions.       This review seems to be more about my reading priority than the work of the author. The author have of course fair ideas about how you can make change and be productive and successful and the best and the most important and........ But at the end it depends on the reader himself to how extent he is ready to act and change himself accordingly.      There are huge number of books being published in these genre everyday. All of them presenting same ideas but putting dif...

The White Tiger | Movie Review

The White Tiger - 2021 Directed By : Ramin Bahrani The White Tiger have many kind of problems, but they are not very stark. They are not significant, but still quite obstruct this film to be a lot better than what it is. This is awkward, lukewarm and confusing film throughout, but enjoying nonetheless. As an adaptation of Arvind Adiga's Booker Prize winning book, this film is somewhat accurate and faithful to its source material. The book was also quite lukewarm and confusing. And if I am allowed to be little more critical, it was gimmicky. And the film somewhat makes that gimmick much more obvious and visible here. There are instances where you have to join the universal opinion and question your own judgment because of it. When you read a book or watch a film, people are so crazed about that piece of work, but you don't see the greatness of the work which the people around you are referring to. And more often than not, you question your own judgement in that case ...